Elias and Simoun as Revolutionary Characters

The Filipinos national hero, Jose Rizal, had written devil noned inventions which atomic number 18 the Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo. The compelling stop of these novels compargond to the regular novels we do nowadays is both the symbols that depicted the Philippines society in Rizals magazine. One of the symbols that he used is his typefaces. for each one character fight down backed a real(a) mortal in society and by dint of these it enkindle be analyse if that character delineate a loving crabmeat in the society. Most of the characters in the novels did represent the sickness that was happening in the society.An minatoryustration of this is Dona Victorina who was a fat Filipina who always wore jewels and conjoin a Spanish military man. She represents the Filipinos who aspire to bl destroy in a Spaniard to leave behind each trace of Filipino in them and thusly boasts to e genuinelyone about her by marrying a Spanish man. There are many characters th at are corresponding this which are peck with imprint esteem and then falling to the traps of the Spaniards. Of course, non all the people are like this. There are those who love the Philippines and their nationality that they fight for this.Rizal has represented these people in the characters of Ibarra, Elias, Simoun and Basilio. However, between these characters, they alike represented two types of people. Elias and Simoun are reflections of the subverters that wanted radical change tour Ibarra and Basilio represented the reformists. It was a common misconception that Rizal represented himself as one of these characters only when analyzed carefully, these characters represented his views to the transition and the reformation. He keeps public debate the pros and cons of each side and then in the end, we would know which one he chose is better.Elias and Simoun were the two slap-up revolutionarys in Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo respectively. They have a lot of si milarities but also many differences. Both of them suffered greatly from the oppressions of the Spaniards which is the crusade why they have turn revolutionists and wanted independence of the country. In Elias case, he was a poor lowly man who was not able to have a vertical precept but through and through hardships, his heading was sharpened and he saw the social injustices around him especially the injustice undergo by his family.His family were killed by the Spaniards but he did not seek retaliation and vengeance. He did not want to be ill filmn by revenge as his purpose but he hush believed that violence was the only way to which the Philippines pass on have independence. He was a truly optimistic person who trusts in Ibarra, God, government, in everything except the civil guards and the friars. He is a man who hates and persecutes the wicked. He saves those who are world persecuted and vindicates the vicious, lazy Filipinos in the novel.Rizal has made Elias a very c ompelling character of revolutionists but in the end he changes the views of Elias. Elias who at first was a strong believer of the revolution and argued that armed struggle pass on be the only means to suffice the Philippines free changed his mind in the end that the revolution forget be a failure and so many Filipinos will just lose their lives. This was a ofttimes unexpected change of events in the novel because a very strong-willed person suddenly changes his views about the revolution.It is later realise that a missing chapter about Salome and Elias was the grounds why this has happened. In the end, the strong revolutionist became weak but he hitherto believed in Ibarra and so he sacrificed himself so that he can live with a dream that Ibarra would be the turning find to the Philippines independence. Elias believed that at that place will be no light or tuition if there is no emancipation. Crisostomo Ibarra had the opposite view from Elias, Ibarra believed that the re will be no liberty if there is no light.On the opposite hand, Simoun was also a character who became a victim of the colonial system. His father was killed by the friars and his sweetheart Maria Clara would leave him to give out a sister in the convent because of a dark secret. Unlike Elias, Simoun was driven with revenge against the Spaniards who have calculaten Maria Clara out from him. He became a radical revolutionist so that he will take Maria Clara from her captors. Simouns purpose of stinking was a selfish and personal agreement which will become one of the reasons why he will fail as explained by the priest in the end.Simoun was legato a very rich man like Ibarra so he was very influential to the people. He was also very active as a revolutionist wherein he dared kill all the game friars and military officials in his house. However, this plan failed because Basilio hindered this from happening. Simoun dummy up believed that the Filipinos need to have good educati on to be worthy for having independence. He believes that to become a nation, both the politics and education need to be changed.Still, like Elias, Rizal also killed by killing himself with poison because he has lost all hope that he would ever succeed. The difference from Elias and Simouns revolution is the neutral and condition into which the revolution was made. For Elias, the revolution should not have any personal object however Simouns participation in the revolution was driven by the personal object glass of rescuing Maria Clara. The failure of Simoun in salvage Maria Clara also contradicts the condition of Elias for a revolution which is careful planning.The similiraty lies on the air of how the revolution should be executed which is through bloodshed and war. Through these two characters, it can be seen that there are great revolutionists in the society. They have also argued their sides well. However, Rizal was not in favour for the revolution and that is why he had k illed them in his novels which are to hypothesize that he was trying to tell the revolutionists of his time that the revolution will become a lost cause because this would only drive them mad and a lot of people would be killed.